American families and policy makers are simultaneously facing national public health, criminal justice reform and global economic issues. National, state and local leaders need to look at using our tax dollars to make thoughtful investments in our cities and communities that can not only address one societal need, but can also positively contribute in multiple ways.
Look no further than affordable, quality housing; something our city is severely lacking. The Greater New Orleans Housing Alliance estimates that the City of New Orleans currently needs 33,000 additional affordable housing units. More than 60 percent of renters in the city are cost burdened, meaning they spend more than 30 percent of their income on housing, and 35 percent are severely cost burdened, spending more than 50 percent on housing. It’s forcing more and more families, who have lived in New Orleans for many generations, to move out of the city. And researchers tell us that New Orleans lost 671 affordable housing units over the last two years.
Stable housing is the strongest predictor or social determinant of good health, growing family wealth and increasing educational outcomes for American families. Unfortunately the reverse is also
true. For housing advocates, this isn’t a new concept and there are decades of research and a continuously growing
body of literature
that affirms that if a family has affordable, stable, good quality housing that it increases their chances of doing better in
school,
employment, and better overall health.
We’ve known this for a long time at Crescent City Community Land Trust (CCCLT) and it’s why our vision for New Orleans is to help create a resident-led city where every New Orleanian can afford to live, work, and thrive in a community of their choice for generations to come. We pursue this vision through the community land trust (CLT) model of affordable housing, which entails permanent affordability coupled with stewardship and community building.
All government and academic research (and common sense) illustrate that the use of our tax dollars in affordable housing promotes life stability and is also an indirect, positive investment in people’s education, employment and wealth development and health:
● “Low income children who switch schools frequently due to housing instability or homelessness tend to perform less well in school, have learning disabilities and behavioral problems, and are less likely to graduate from high school.” (
Voight, Shinn, & Nation, 2012)
● “…residents reported that the stability of rent payments allowed them to develop intentional strategies for employment and advancement.” (
Carolina Reid, 2018)
● “Access to affordable housing promotes health and well-being and reduces hospital visits” (
Thomas Kottke, MD, MSPH)
It’s clear that making affordable housing more available will help people in numerous ways, but too many of our current efforts at creating affordable housing have an expiration date. These efforts represent what we in the community land trust world call “temporary affordability.” For example, most affordable rental units in New Orleans are developed using a tax credit program that creates 15-30 years of affordability. In 2017, after 15 years of taxpayer financed affordability, the American Can apartment building on Bayou St. John kicked out 50 low-to-moderate income families. Consequently, New Orleans lost 50 affordable units that year and the Bayou St. John neighborhood lost some of its socio-economic diversity (and likely some racial diversity given how closely linked income and race are in Louisiana).
On the affordable homeownership front, single family homes purchased with taxpayer-funded soft second mortgages help families buy homes, move into areas they might not otherwise be able to afford, and can help grow a family’s wealth. Nonetheless, after the ten-year affordability compliance period ends with a soft second mortgage and/or after the that family sells the home, the affordability also goes away, and we as taxpayers must then fund another soft second mortgage to maintain the total number of affordable units in our community. Assisting low-to-moderate income families in growing their wealth, however, is an excellent reason for taxpayers to continue supporting the use of soft second mortgages. And we taxpayers should also want more alternative, potentially permanent and possibly more efficient tools available to create quality, affordable housing within the public policy toolbox.
CCCLT’s mission is to ensure permanent affordability in housing and commercial spaces for generations to come through equitable residential and commercial development, land stewardship, and housing advocacy. CCCLT single family homes, such as the two we have sold in the Lower 9th Ward over the past six months, remain affordable because the CLT owns the land the homes sit on--leasing it in perpetuity to the family that buys the house--so when that family sells the house to the next family, the land trust can maintain an affordable price even while surrounding property values rapidly increase.
We sometimes refer to our single family CLT homes as “single family affordable condominiums” because we all know in a condo situation, the condo owner does not own the entire building – they only own their part of the building. Similarly, by holding onto the land, the CLT is co-owner with the homeowner, keeping prices low for generations. Just like in a traditional homeownership situation, the CLT homeowner can gain wealth and more equity in their home over time while also helping maintain the neighborhood’s affordability. When CCCLT acts as a co-developer as we did with the Pythian building in downtown New Orleans, we enter into agreements that allow the land trust to offer permanently affordable rental units and stewardship or community building services for generations to come.
CCCLT’s model fosters community resilience through community building, stewardship and affordability; we also make certain that our developments are conceived with transit concerns, energy efficiency and physical resilience in mind as we all face global climate change. The Pythian building is adjacent to the city’s main transit hub and the building itself is designed to promote bicycle usage through the provision of 50 internal bicycle stations, a bike wash and shower facilities specifically for bicycle users. Energy efficiency features within the building also mean that it uses approximately 50% less utilities than comparable structures. In our single family home developments – wherein we share control of the land with our homeowners – CCCLT is now exploring the possible co-location of neighborhood scale water retention features with input from researchers at MIT and Tulane University.
In line with our theory of change, CCCLT is taking the community land trust model in new directions to better serve New Orleanians on the multi-family and commercial front. CCCLT is now identifying potential partners – families and small real estate owners - who own land or dilapidated structures in the inner core communities where we are focused (available real estate is a precious and expensive commodity in the gentrifying communities where CCCLT works).
We are offering these families our technical expertise, resources and capital to potentially develop new, permanently affordable community assets and amenities. Thus the CLT model can become a wealth building strategy for a broader cross section of the community, not just wealth building through single-family CLT home ownership. Our first partner with this demonstration program is the Vaucresson family, who operate a 120-year old, African-American-owned business now in its fourth generation of making their traditional Creole sausage product. CCCLT is helping the Vaucresson family re-establish their presence in the 7th Ward neighborhood of New Orleans where the company was founded; their storefront having been shuttered since Hurricane Katrina. In addition to creating a new retail amenity in the 7th Ward community, CCCLT will also create two permanently affordable apartments above the Vaucresson family business. CCCLT is actively working around New Orleans to implement strategies that will slow and reverse growth in the racial wealth gap.
When city, state, and local governments spend public money on housing, they are also investing in employment, family wealth and public health. So, when they are making these types of vital societal investments, shouldn’t we as tax payers also want our decision makers to fund permanent affordability coupled with stewardship and community building that will benefit future generations?